Split Testing (or A/B Testing)
Split testing (A/B testing) compares variants of an email to see which performs better on a chosen metric.
Definition & Examples
What is Split Testing?
Split testing, or A/B testing, is a method used to optimize email performance by comparing two or more variations of an email against each other. Elements such as subject lines, call-to-action buttons, images, copy length or sending times can be tested. The test group is divided into segments, each receiving a different version, and metrics like open rate, click-through rate and conversions are measured to identify the most effective variant.
This statistical approach removes guesswork from email marketing decisions by providing concrete data about what resonates best with your audience.
Why it matters
Data-driven decisions: Replace assumptions with statistical evidence about what works
Improved performance: Continuous testing can increase open rates by 10-15% and click rates by 20-30%
Better ROI: Higher-performing emails generate more revenue per send
Audience insights: Learn what motivates your specific subscribers to engage
Competitive advantage: Outperform competitors who rely on best practices alone
Core principles of effective A/B testing
Statistical significance
Test with large enough sample sizes to achieve reliable results
Aim for at least 95% confidence level before declaring a winner
Account for seasonal variations and external factors
Run tests for sufficient duration to capture different user behaviors
Single variable testing
Change only one element at a time to isolate cause and effect
Test the most impactful elements first (subject lines, CTAs, timing)
Document all test variables and results for future reference
Build a testing roadmap with prioritized experiments
Clear hypothesis formation
Start with specific, measurable predictions
Base hypotheses on data, user feedback, or industry insights
Define success metrics before launching tests
Consider both primary and secondary effects
What to test in email campaigns
Subject lines
High-impact variables:
Length (short vs long)
Personalization (with vs without first name)
Urgency language ("Limited time" vs neutral)
Question vs statement format
Emoji usage and placement
Example test:
Version A: "Your weekly newsletter is here"
Version B: "5 tips to boost productivity this week 📈"
Email content and design
Copy variations:
Short vs long-form content
Benefits-focused vs feature-focused messaging
Formal vs casual tone
First person vs second person language
Social proof inclusion
Visual elements:
Button colors and sizes
Image placement and style
Layout (single vs multi-column)
Font choices and sizes
Color schemes
Call-to-action (CTA) optimization
Button text variations:
"Buy Now" vs "Shop Today"
"Learn More" vs "Discover How"
"Get Started" vs "Try Free"
Action-oriented vs benefit-oriented
Button design:
Color (contrasting vs brand colors)
Size (large vs medium)
Shape (rounded vs square)
Placement (top vs bottom)
Sending optimization
Timing tests:
Day of week (Tuesday vs Thursday)
Time of day (morning vs afternoon vs evening)
Frequency (weekly vs bi-weekly)
Timezone considerations for global audiences
Segmentation approaches:
Geographic targeting
Behavioral segmentation
Demographic splits
Engagement level grouping
How to set up A/B tests
Planning phase
Define objectives: What specific metric do you want to improve?
Choose test element: Select one variable to test
Create hypothesis: Predict which version will perform better and why
Set success metrics: Define primary and secondary KPIs
Calculate sample size: Ensure statistical validity
Test setup
Sample size calculation:
Use statistical calculators to determine minimum audience size
Typical split: 50/50 for two variants, adjust for multiple variants
Reserve portion of list for winner rollout (e.g., test 20%, rollout to remaining 80%)
Account for list growth and churn during test period
Random assignment:
Ensure truly random distribution to avoid bias
Use subscriber ID or email hash for consistent assignment
Avoid testing during unusual periods (holidays, major events)
Document external factors that might influence results
Execution best practices
Test duration:
Run tests for at least 24-48 hours for open rate tests
Extend to 7 days for click and conversion testing
Consider multiple send times to capture different user behaviors
Stop tests early only if results reach high statistical significance
Quality control:
Preview all variants before sending
Test deliverability across email clients
Monitor for technical issues during send
Track unsubscribe rates and spam complaints
Analyzing A/B test results
Statistical analysis
Key metrics to evaluate:
Open rate: Subject line and sender name effectiveness
Click-through rate: Content and CTA performance
Conversion rate: Overall campaign effectiveness
Unsubscribe rate: Audience satisfaction
Revenue per email: Business impact
Statistical significance testing:
Use proper statistical tests (chi-square, t-test)
Don't declare winners prematurely
Account for multiple comparisons if testing more than 2 variants
Consider practical significance alongside statistical significance
Result interpretation
Understanding lift:
Calculate percentage improvement of winning variant
Assess whether improvement justifies implementation effort
Consider confidence intervals, not just point estimates
Evaluate consistency across different segments
Segment analysis:
Break down results by subscriber segments
Look for patterns across demographics or behaviors
Identify when personalization improves results
Consider different approaches for different audiences
Advanced A/B testing strategies
Multivariate testing
Test multiple elements simultaneously to understand interactions:
Subject line + CTA color combinations
Image + copy variations
Layout + timing optimizations
Requires larger sample sizes but provides richer insights
Sequential testing
Build upon previous test results:
Test winning elements against new challengers
Gradually optimize multiple campaign elements
Create testing roadmaps based on impact potential
Document learnings for future campaigns
Behavioral triggered tests
Test automated campaign variations:
Welcome series A/B tests
Cart abandonment email variants
Re-engagement campaign approaches
Birthday vs anniversary messaging
Cross-channel testing
Coordinate tests across multiple touchpoints:
Email + social media consistency
Landing page alignment with email design
SMS + email message coordination
Website personalization sync
Common A/B testing mistakes
Insufficient sample sizes
Problem: Declaring winners with too few data points leads to false conclusions
Solutions:
Use statistical calculators to determine minimum sample sizes
Wait for adequate data before making decisions
Consider confidence intervals, not just point estimates
Account for segmentation effects on sample size
Testing too many variables
Problem: Testing multiple elements simultaneously makes it impossible to identify what drove results
Solutions:
Change only one element per test
Create separate tests for different variables
Use multivariate testing only with sufficient sample sizes
Document and prioritize testing hypotheses
Premature optimization
Problem: Stopping tests early or acting on incomplete data
Solutions:
Set predetermined test duration and stick to it
Achieve statistical significance before declaring winners
Consider business context alongside statistical results
Test during representative time periods
Ignoring external factors
Problem: Not accounting for seasonality, holidays, or market events
Solutions:
Document external factors during test periods
Repeat important tests during different time periods
Consider creating separate baselines for different seasons
Adjust testing schedules around known disruptions
A/B testing tools and platforms
Native email platform features
Most email service providers offer built-in A/B testing:
Loops: Integrated split testing with statistical analysis
Mailchimp: Comprehensive testing options
Klaviyo: Advanced segmentation and testing
ConvertKit: Simple A/B testing interface
Advanced analytics tools
Google Analytics: Track conversions and revenue impact
Optimizely: Sophisticated experimentation platform
VWO: Conversion optimization tools
Adobe Target: Enterprise-level testing
Statistical analysis
R or Python: Custom statistical analysis
Excel/Google Sheets: Basic significance testing
Statistical calculators: Online tools for sample size and significance
Survey tools: Collect qualitative feedback on test variants
Building a testing culture
Organizational setup
Testing governance:
Establish testing protocols and approval processes
Create hypothesis documentation templates
Set up regular review meetings for test results
Maintain testing calendar to avoid conflicts
Team training:
Educate team on statistical concepts
Provide tools and resources for test setup
Create testing playbooks and guidelines
Share results and learnings across organization
Continuous improvement
Documentation practices:
Maintain testing history and results database
Document failed tests as well as successes
Create testing playbooks based on learnings
Share insights with broader marketing team
Evolution of testing program:
Regularly review and update testing priorities
Graduate from basic to advanced testing methods
Incorporate new tools and technologies
Expand testing to new channels and touchpoints
Industry benchmarks and expectations
Typical improvement ranges
Subject line tests: 5-20% improvement in open rates
CTA tests: 10-30% improvement in click rates
Design tests: 15-25% improvement in engagement
Timing tests: 10-40% improvement depending on audience
Testing frequency recommendations
High-volume senders: Test every major campaign
Medium-volume senders: Test 1-2 elements monthly
Low-volume senders: Focus on highest-impact elements quarterly
Automated campaigns: Test annually or when performance declines
Measuring long-term impact
Portfolio optimization
Track cumulative impact of testing program:
Overall performance improvements over time
Revenue attribution to testing initiatives
Cost savings from improved efficiency
Subscriber satisfaction and retention improvements
Predictive insights
Use testing data for future planning:
Seasonal performance patterns
Audience preference evolution
Channel effectiveness changes
Content topic performance trends
Related terms
Key takeaways
A/B testing removes guesswork from email marketing by providing statistical evidence of what works
Test one variable at a time with sufficient sample sizes to achieve reliable results
Focus on high-impact elements like subject lines, CTAs, and sending times for maximum improvement
Proper statistical analysis and patience are crucial for accurate results
Build a systematic testing program with documented processes and regular optimization cycles
Ready to send better email?
Loops is a better way to send product, marketing, and transactional email for your SaaS company.
Split testing (A/B testing) compares variants of an email to see which performs better on a chosen metric.
Definition & Examples
What is Split Testing?
Split testing, or A/B testing, is a method used to optimize email performance by comparing two or more variations of an email against each other. Elements such as subject lines, call-to-action buttons, images, copy length or sending times can be tested. The test group is divided into segments, each receiving a different version, and metrics like open rate, click-through rate and conversions are measured to identify the most effective variant.
This statistical approach removes guesswork from email marketing decisions by providing concrete data about what resonates best with your audience.
Why it matters
Data-driven decisions: Replace assumptions with statistical evidence about what works
Improved performance: Continuous testing can increase open rates by 10-15% and click rates by 20-30%
Better ROI: Higher-performing emails generate more revenue per send
Audience insights: Learn what motivates your specific subscribers to engage
Competitive advantage: Outperform competitors who rely on best practices alone
Core principles of effective A/B testing
Statistical significance
Test with large enough sample sizes to achieve reliable results
Aim for at least 95% confidence level before declaring a winner
Account for seasonal variations and external factors
Run tests for sufficient duration to capture different user behaviors
Single variable testing
Change only one element at a time to isolate cause and effect
Test the most impactful elements first (subject lines, CTAs, timing)
Document all test variables and results for future reference
Build a testing roadmap with prioritized experiments
Clear hypothesis formation
Start with specific, measurable predictions
Base hypotheses on data, user feedback, or industry insights
Define success metrics before launching tests
Consider both primary and secondary effects
What to test in email campaigns
Subject lines
High-impact variables:
Length (short vs long)
Personalization (with vs without first name)
Urgency language ("Limited time" vs neutral)
Question vs statement format
Emoji usage and placement
Example test:
Version A: "Your weekly newsletter is here"
Version B: "5 tips to boost productivity this week 📈"
Email content and design
Copy variations:
Short vs long-form content
Benefits-focused vs feature-focused messaging
Formal vs casual tone
First person vs second person language
Social proof inclusion
Visual elements:
Button colors and sizes
Image placement and style
Layout (single vs multi-column)
Font choices and sizes
Color schemes
Call-to-action (CTA) optimization
Button text variations:
"Buy Now" vs "Shop Today"
"Learn More" vs "Discover How"
"Get Started" vs "Try Free"
Action-oriented vs benefit-oriented
Button design:
Color (contrasting vs brand colors)
Size (large vs medium)
Shape (rounded vs square)
Placement (top vs bottom)
Sending optimization
Timing tests:
Day of week (Tuesday vs Thursday)
Time of day (morning vs afternoon vs evening)
Frequency (weekly vs bi-weekly)
Timezone considerations for global audiences
Segmentation approaches:
Geographic targeting
Behavioral segmentation
Demographic splits
Engagement level grouping
How to set up A/B tests
Planning phase
Define objectives: What specific metric do you want to improve?
Choose test element: Select one variable to test
Create hypothesis: Predict which version will perform better and why
Set success metrics: Define primary and secondary KPIs
Calculate sample size: Ensure statistical validity
Test setup
Sample size calculation:
Use statistical calculators to determine minimum audience size
Typical split: 50/50 for two variants, adjust for multiple variants
Reserve portion of list for winner rollout (e.g., test 20%, rollout to remaining 80%)
Account for list growth and churn during test period
Random assignment:
Ensure truly random distribution to avoid bias
Use subscriber ID or email hash for consistent assignment
Avoid testing during unusual periods (holidays, major events)
Document external factors that might influence results
Execution best practices
Test duration:
Run tests for at least 24-48 hours for open rate tests
Extend to 7 days for click and conversion testing
Consider multiple send times to capture different user behaviors
Stop tests early only if results reach high statistical significance
Quality control:
Preview all variants before sending
Test deliverability across email clients
Monitor for technical issues during send
Track unsubscribe rates and spam complaints
Analyzing A/B test results
Statistical analysis
Key metrics to evaluate:
Open rate: Subject line and sender name effectiveness
Click-through rate: Content and CTA performance
Conversion rate: Overall campaign effectiveness
Unsubscribe rate: Audience satisfaction
Revenue per email: Business impact
Statistical significance testing:
Use proper statistical tests (chi-square, t-test)
Don't declare winners prematurely
Account for multiple comparisons if testing more than 2 variants
Consider practical significance alongside statistical significance
Result interpretation
Understanding lift:
Calculate percentage improvement of winning variant
Assess whether improvement justifies implementation effort
Consider confidence intervals, not just point estimates
Evaluate consistency across different segments
Segment analysis:
Break down results by subscriber segments
Look for patterns across demographics or behaviors
Identify when personalization improves results
Consider different approaches for different audiences
Advanced A/B testing strategies
Multivariate testing
Test multiple elements simultaneously to understand interactions:
Subject line + CTA color combinations
Image + copy variations
Layout + timing optimizations
Requires larger sample sizes but provides richer insights
Sequential testing
Build upon previous test results:
Test winning elements against new challengers
Gradually optimize multiple campaign elements
Create testing roadmaps based on impact potential
Document learnings for future campaigns
Behavioral triggered tests
Test automated campaign variations:
Welcome series A/B tests
Cart abandonment email variants
Re-engagement campaign approaches
Birthday vs anniversary messaging
Cross-channel testing
Coordinate tests across multiple touchpoints:
Email + social media consistency
Landing page alignment with email design
SMS + email message coordination
Website personalization sync
Common A/B testing mistakes
Insufficient sample sizes
Problem: Declaring winners with too few data points leads to false conclusions
Solutions:
Use statistical calculators to determine minimum sample sizes
Wait for adequate data before making decisions
Consider confidence intervals, not just point estimates
Account for segmentation effects on sample size
Testing too many variables
Problem: Testing multiple elements simultaneously makes it impossible to identify what drove results
Solutions:
Change only one element per test
Create separate tests for different variables
Use multivariate testing only with sufficient sample sizes
Document and prioritize testing hypotheses
Premature optimization
Problem: Stopping tests early or acting on incomplete data
Solutions:
Set predetermined test duration and stick to it
Achieve statistical significance before declaring winners
Consider business context alongside statistical results
Test during representative time periods
Ignoring external factors
Problem: Not accounting for seasonality, holidays, or market events
Solutions:
Document external factors during test periods
Repeat important tests during different time periods
Consider creating separate baselines for different seasons
Adjust testing schedules around known disruptions
A/B testing tools and platforms
Native email platform features
Most email service providers offer built-in A/B testing:
Loops: Integrated split testing with statistical analysis
Mailchimp: Comprehensive testing options
Klaviyo: Advanced segmentation and testing
ConvertKit: Simple A/B testing interface
Advanced analytics tools
Google Analytics: Track conversions and revenue impact
Optimizely: Sophisticated experimentation platform
VWO: Conversion optimization tools
Adobe Target: Enterprise-level testing
Statistical analysis
R or Python: Custom statistical analysis
Excel/Google Sheets: Basic significance testing
Statistical calculators: Online tools for sample size and significance
Survey tools: Collect qualitative feedback on test variants
Building a testing culture
Organizational setup
Testing governance:
Establish testing protocols and approval processes
Create hypothesis documentation templates
Set up regular review meetings for test results
Maintain testing calendar to avoid conflicts
Team training:
Educate team on statistical concepts
Provide tools and resources for test setup
Create testing playbooks and guidelines
Share results and learnings across organization
Continuous improvement
Documentation practices:
Maintain testing history and results database
Document failed tests as well as successes
Create testing playbooks based on learnings
Share insights with broader marketing team
Evolution of testing program:
Regularly review and update testing priorities
Graduate from basic to advanced testing methods
Incorporate new tools and technologies
Expand testing to new channels and touchpoints
Industry benchmarks and expectations
Typical improvement ranges
Subject line tests: 5-20% improvement in open rates
CTA tests: 10-30% improvement in click rates
Design tests: 15-25% improvement in engagement
Timing tests: 10-40% improvement depending on audience
Testing frequency recommendations
High-volume senders: Test every major campaign
Medium-volume senders: Test 1-2 elements monthly
Low-volume senders: Focus on highest-impact elements quarterly
Automated campaigns: Test annually or when performance declines
Measuring long-term impact
Portfolio optimization
Track cumulative impact of testing program:
Overall performance improvements over time
Revenue attribution to testing initiatives
Cost savings from improved efficiency
Subscriber satisfaction and retention improvements
Predictive insights
Use testing data for future planning:
Seasonal performance patterns
Audience preference evolution
Channel effectiveness changes
Content topic performance trends
Related terms
Key takeaways
A/B testing removes guesswork from email marketing by providing statistical evidence of what works
Test one variable at a time with sufficient sample sizes to achieve reliable results
Focus on high-impact elements like subject lines, CTAs, and sending times for maximum improvement
Proper statistical analysis and patience are crucial for accurate results
Build a systematic testing program with documented processes and regular optimization cycles
© 2025 Astrodon Inc.
© 2025 Astrodon Inc.
© 2025 Astrodon Inc.
© 2025 Astrodon Inc.